4.6 Article

γ-valerolactone from levulinic acid and its esters: Substrate and reaction media determine the optimal catalyst

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 623, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2021.118276

Keywords

gamma-valerolactone; Levulinic acid; Methyl levulinate; Ethyl levulinate; Nickel; Ruthenium; Sepiolite; Alumina

Funding

  1. MINECO [MAT2017-84118-C2-2-R, MAT2017-84118-C2-1-R]
  2. FEDER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ni-based and Ru-based catalysts were compared for the production of gamma-valerolactone from levulinic acid and esters, with optimal performance of tiny nickel particles. Reaction conditions and media significantly influenced substrate reactivity, with Ni catalyst showing best results in 2-propanol. Stability was observed after 3 cycles for both Ni and Ru catalysts, while the use of metallic Zn for hydrogen supply in aqueous medium was deemed unsuitable due to lack of stability.
Ni-based catalysts supported on sepiolite were synthesized by different preparation procedures for the production of gamma-valerolactone from levulinic acid and its esters (methyl levulinate and ethyl levulinate). The optimal performance was related to the formation of tiny nickel particles. Interestingly, the reaction conditions significantly influence the reactivity of the substrates. The catalytic performance of the optimal Ni/sepiolite catalyst was compared with two catalysts of ruthenium (supported on gamma-alumina or sepiolite). In all cases, the production of gamma-valerolactone depends on both the substrate employed and the reaction media. Overall, the preferred reaction media using the Ni-catalyst is 2-propanol whereas pressurized hydrogen in water is the best alternative for Ru-catalysts. In both cases, a reasonable stability has been observed after 3 cycles. Finally, the use of metallic Zn in an aqueous medium to provide hydrogen could not be considered as an appropriate option due to the lack of a stable behaviour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available