4.7 Article

Experimental comparison of various excitation and acquisition techniques for modal analysis of violins

Journal

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 177, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.107942

Keywords

Modal analysis; Violin; NDT; Acoustic excitation

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Foundation Flanders FWO [1180217 N, 1148018 N, 12T5418N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a critical comparison of various experimental modal analysis approaches with the violin as a case study, considering both contact and non-contact excitation and different acquisition approaches. The influence of different boundary conditions on the vibrational response of the violin is investigated, and relevant modal parameters are extracted within the frequency range of 0-1000 Hz. Two optimal approaches for performing modal analysis on violins are proposed, one for use in the violinmaker's practice and one for use with fragile instruments.
For decades, modal analysis has been a tool to gain insights in the vibrational and acoustical behavior of music instruments. This study provides a critical comparison of various experimental modal analysis approaches with the violin as a case study. Both contact and non-contact excitation and different acquisition approaches are considered. The influence of different boundary conditions (clamped, supported, free/free) on the vibrational response of the violin is investigated. The response is analyzed to extract relevant modal parameters (frequency, damping and mode shape) within the frequency range of 0-1000 Hz. The performance of the different approaches is evaluated in terms of (i) signature vibration modes, (ii) experimental reproducibility, (iii) contact requirement and (iv) cost of required equipment. Two optimal approaches are proposed for performing modal analysis on violins: a contact method for use in the violinmaker's practice, and a non-contact method for use with fragile instruments. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available