4.7 Article

In-vitro comparison of volumetric and areal bone mineral density measurements between ultrasound transit time spectroscopy and microcomputed tomography

Journal

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108072

Keywords

Ultrasound; Transit time spectroscopy; Volumetric bone mineral density; Areal bone mineral density; Bone assessment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study proposed a novel method based on ultrasound transit time spectroscopy to derive volumetric and areal bone mineral densities. Results obtained by ultrasound showed high correlations with those obtained by microcomputed tomography when measuring bone density.
Quantitative ultrasound is a scientifically and clinically accepted diagnostic technique for assessing and predicting osteoporotic fracture risk. However, it does not provide a direct measurement of areal bone mineral density, and hence cannot implement the World Health Organization T score criteria for osteoporosis and osteopenia. In this study, we developed a novel method based on the concept of ultrasound transit time spectroscopy (UTTS) to derive volumetric and areal bone mineral densities. Through-transmission ultrasound signals at 1 MHz were used to measure 12 human femoral head in-vitro bone samples. Volumetric and areal bone mineral densities were calculated from the derived and corrected ultrasound transit time spectra. A linear regression model was used to compare the results obtained by ultrasound with those by microcomputed tomography. This analysis showed coefficients of determination (R-2) of 86% and 80% for volumetric and areal bone mineral density, respectively. Given that quantitative ultrasound is nonionizing, low cost, and portable, we propose that directly derived areal bone mineral density obtained using ultrasound transit time spectroscopy, UTTS-aBMD, may be utilized for osteoporosis assessment, implementing the WHO T score criteria. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available