4.7 Article

Renal and Hepatic Toxicity Analysis of Remdesivir Formulations: Does What Is on the Inside Really Count?

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 65, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01045-21

Keywords

lyophilized; remdesivir; SARS-CoV-2; solution; renal failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that there was no significant association between the use of injectable solution or lyophilized powder of remdesivir in treating SARS-CoV-2 patients and acute kidney injury. Additionally, there was no significant difference in early discontinuation rates due to abnormal liver function tests between the two formulations.
It has been postulated that the injectable solution formulation of remdesivir could be more nephrotoxic than the lyophilized powder since it contains twice as much sulfobutylether- b- cyclodextrin (SBECD). Therefore, we evaluated 1,000 hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) who received remdesivir lyophilized powder or solution. A logistic regression model accounting for baseline confounders identified that neither the use of the injectable solution (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 2.29; P = 0.901) nor a creatinine clearance of <30 ml/min at the time of remdesivir initiation (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.51 to 3.5; P = 0.499) was significantly associated with acute kidney injury. Regarding hepatoxicity, there was no significant difference in early discontinuation of remdesivir due to abnormal liver function tests between patients who received the lyophilized powder versus those who received solution (0.9% versus 2.3%, P = 0.09).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available