4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Growth Suppression of Cancer Spheroids With Mutated KRAS by Low-toxicity Compounds from Natural Products

Journal

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 8, Pages 4061-4070

Publisher

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15207

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; KRAS; 3D floating culture; natural products

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [15K06847, 18K07215]
  2. Fukuoka Foundation for Sound Health Cancer Research Fund
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K07215, 15K06847] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified NP882 (STAR3) as the most effective inhibitor of growth of HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids with the least toxicity among NP910 derivatives. STAR3 showed significant growth suppression in tumor cells in both LT3DF and nude mice assay.
Background/Aim: Among compounds from natural products selectively suppressing the growth of cancer spheroids, which have mutant (mt) KRAS, NP910 was selected and its derivatives explored. Materials and Methods: The area of HKe3 spheroids expressing wild type (wt) KRAS (HKe3wtKRAS) and mtKRAS (HKe3-mtKRAS) were measured in three-dimensional floating (3DF) cultures treated with 18 NP910 derivatives. The 50% cell growth inhibition (GI50) was determined by long-term 3DF (LT3DF) culture and nude mice assay. Results: We selected NP882 (named STAR3) as the most effective inhibitor of growth of HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids with the least toxicity among NP910 derivatives. GI50s of STAR3 in LT3DF and nude mice assay were 6 mu M and 30.75 mg/kg, respectively. However, growth suppression by STAR3 was observed in 50% of cell lines independent of KRAS mutation, suggesting that the target of STAR3 was not directly associated with KRAS mutation and KRAS-related signals. Conclusion: STAR3 is a low-toxicity compound that inhibits growth of certain tumour cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available