4.3 Article

The Effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treating Patients with Leukemia

Journal

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2016/8394850

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence [MOHW105-TDU-B-212-133019]
  2. China Medical University Hospital
  3. Academia Sinica Taiwan Biobank Stroke Biosignature Project [BM10501010037]
  4. NRPB Stroke Clinical Trial Consortium [MOST 105-2325-B-039-003]
  5. Tseng-Lien Lin Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan
  6. Taiwan Brain Disease Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan
  7. Katsuzo and Kiyo Aoshima Memorial Funds, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leukemia is the most common malignancy among all childhood cancers and is associated with a low survival rate in adult patients. Since 1995, the National Health Insurance (NHI) program in Taiwan has been offering insurance coverage for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), along with conventional Western medicine (WM). This study analyzes the status of TCM utilization in Taiwan, in both pediatric and adult patients with leukemia. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using population-based National Health Insurance Research Database of Registry of Catastrophic Illness, involving patient data from 2001 to 2010 and follow-up data through 2011. The effectiveness of TCM use was evaluated. Relevant sociodemographic data showed that both pediatric and adult patients who were TCM users one year prior to leukemia diagnosis were more likely to utilize TCM services for cancer therapy. A greater part of medical expenditure of TCM users was lower than that of TCM nonusers, except little discrepancy in drug fee of adult patients. The survival rate is also higher in TCM users. Altogether, these data show that TCM has the potential to serve as an adjuvant therapy when combined with conventional WM in the treatment of patients with leukemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available