4.5 Review

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 321-337

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-042220-022745

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL128526]
  2. Special Research Fund (BOF) of Hasselt University [BOF19PD04]
  3. Japan Heart Foundation/Bayer Yakuhin Research Grant Abroad
  4. JSPS Overseas Research Fellowships from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasing rapidly, and it has significant impact on the functional capacity and quality of life of patients. Unlike heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there are limited effective treatments available for HFpEF. Therefore, improved understanding of its pathophysiologic mechanisms and individualized treatment strategies is crucial.
Approximately half of all patients with heart failure (HF) have a preserved ejection fraction, and the prevalence is growing rapidly given the aging population in many countries and the rising prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. Functional capacity and quality of life are severely impaired in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and morbidity and mortality are high. In striking contrast to HF with reduced ejection fraction, there are few effective treatments currently identified for HFpEF, and these are limited to decongestion by diuretics, promotion of a healthy active lifestyle, and management of comorbidities. Improved phenotyping of subgroups within the overall HFpEF population might enhance individualization of treatment. This review focuses on the current understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying HFpEF and treatment strategies for this complex syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available