4.6 Review Book Chapter

What HaveWe Learned from the First 500 Avian Genomes?

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-012121-085928

Keywords

comparative genomics; phylogenomics; genome evolution; Aves; a posteriori marker selection; chromosomes

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF DEB-135343/EAR-1355292]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIH 1R01HG011485-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increased capacity of DNA sequencing has led to the availability of over 500 avian reference genomes, contributing to advancements in phylogenomics and comparative, functional, and population genomics. Community-based initiatives like the Bird 10,000 Genomes Project play a crucial role in promoting international collaboration in avian comparative genomics.
The increased capacity of DNA sequencing has significantly advanced our understanding of the phylogeny of birds and the proximate and ultimate mechanisms molding their genomic diversity. In less than a decade, the number of available avian reference genomes has increased to over 500-approximately 5% of bird diversity-placing birds in a privileged position to advance the fields of phylogenomics and comparative, functional, and population genomics. Whole-genome sequence data, as well as indels and rare genomic changes, are further resolving the avian tree of life. The accumulation of bird genomes, increasingly with long-read sequence data, greatly improves the resolution of genomic features such as germline-restricted chromosomes and the Wchromosome, and is facilitating the comparative integration of genotypes and phenotypes. Community-based initiatives such as the Bird 10,000 Genomes Project and Vertebrate Genome Project are playing a fundamental role in amplifying and coalescing a vibrant international program in avian comparative genomics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available