4.6 Article

Consensus for Thoracoscopic Left Upper Lobectomy-Essential Components and Targets for Simulation

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages 436-442

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.152

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Donald J. Ferguson, MD, Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through the Delphi process, thoracic surgeons achieved consensus on the operative steps of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) left upper lobectomy and identified key steps suitable for simulation training.
Background. Simulation-based training is a valuable component of cardiothoracic surgical education. Effective curriculum development requires consensus on procedural components and focused attention on specific learning objectives. Through use of a Delphi process, we established consensus on the steps of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) left upper lobectomy and identified targets for simulation. Methods. Experienced thoracic surgeons were randomly selected for participation. Surgeons voted and commented on the necessity of individual steps comprising VATS left upper lobectomy. Steps with greater than 80% of participants in agreement of their necessity were determined to have established consensus. Participants voted on the physical or cognitive complexity of each, or both, and chose steps most amenable to focused simulation. Results. Thirty thoracic surgeons responded and joined in the voting process. Twenty operative steps were identified, with surgeons reaching consensus on the necessity of 19. Components deemed most difficult and amenable to simulation included those related to dissec-tion and division of the bronchus, artery, and vein. Conclusions. Through a Delphi process, surgeons with a variety of practice patterns can achieve consensus on the operative steps of left upper lobectomy and agreement on those most appropriate for simulation. This information can be implemented in the development of targeted simulation for VATS lobectomy. (C) 2021 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available