Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Prostate Carcinoma Grade and Length But Not Cribriform Architecture at Positive Surgical Margins Are Predictive for Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
Eva Hollemans et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2020)
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods
J. Ferlay et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2019)
Surgical margin status and its impact on prostate cancer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
Lijin Zhang et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2018)
Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer-29-Year Follow-up
Anna Bill-Axelson et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Incidence and location of positive surgical margin among open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: a single institutional analysis
Atsushi Koizumi et al.
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2018)
The Risks and Benefits of Cavernous Neurovascular Bundle Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Laura N. Nguyen et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
Current status of robotic surgery in urology
Masashi Honda et al.
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY (2017)
Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort
H. Wadhwa et al.
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES (2016)
Does Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reduce the Rate of Positive Surgical Margins at Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomised Clinical Trial?
Erik Rud et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2015)
The association between nerve sparing and a positive surgical margin during radical prostatectomy
Mark A. Preston et al.
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS (2015)
Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Contemporary Update
Ofer Yossepowitch et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2014)
Non-apical positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer is associated with the highest risk of recurrence
Martin Andreas Roder et al.
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2014)
Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery
Nazareno Suardi et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2013)
Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria
Koji Mitsuzuka et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2013)
Is pelvic lymph node dissection required at radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer?
Koji Mitsuzuka et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2013)
Changes in Indications and Oncological Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy After 2000-Data From 1268 Japanese Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Between 2000 and 2009
Koji Mitsuzuka et al.
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2013)
Impact of body mass index on clinicopathological outcome and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
S. Narita et al.
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES (2013)
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins
Puay Hoon Tan et al.
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2011)
Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins and Their Locations After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
Rafael F. Coelho et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2010)
Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
James A. Eastham et al.
UROLOGY (2007)
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation
Kevin C. Zorn et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2007)
Share Paper
