4.7 Article

Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Low-Risk Surgical Candidates A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGERY
Volume 277, Issue 4, Pages e864-e871

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005160

Keywords

open surgery; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; pancreaticoduodenectomy; propensity score matching; robotic surgery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). The results showed that RPD had significantly lower estimated blood loss and shorter postoperative length of hospital stay compared to OPD. There were no significant differences in operative time, major complications, or 90-day mortality rates between the two groups. For patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, RPD had advantages in terms of blood loss and hospital stay compared to OPD.
Objectives:This study aimed to perform a multicenter comparison between robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Background:Previous comparisons of RPD versus OPD have only been carried out in small, single-center studies of variable quality. Methods:Consecutive patients who underwent RPD (n = 1032) or OPD (n = 1154) at 7 centers in China between July 2012 and July 2020 were included. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Results:After PSM, 982 patients in each group were enrolled. The RPD group had significantly lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (190.0 vs 260.0 mL; P < 0.001), and a shorter postoperative 1length of hospital stay (LOS) (12.0 (9.0-16.0) days vs 14.5 (11.0-19.0) days; P < 0.001) than the OPD group. There were no significant differences in operative time, major morbidity including clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF), bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, postoperative pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), reoperation, readmission or 90-day mortality rates. Multivariable analysis showed R0 resection, CR-POPF, PPH and reoperation to be independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. Subgroup analysis on patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (n = 326 in each subgroup) showed RPD had advantages over OPD in EBL and postoperative LOS. There were no significant differences in median disease-free survival (15.2 vs 14.3 months, P = 0.94) or median overall survival (24.2 vs 24.1 months, P = 0.88) between the 2 subgroups. Conclusions:RPD was comparable to OPD in feasibility and safety. For patients with PDAC, RPD resulted in similar oncologic and survival outcomes as OPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available