4.2 Article

Evaluating Treatment Preferences and Perceptions of a Prosthetic Versus a Transplanted Hand A Conjoint Analysis-Based Study

Journal

ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 99-104

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002949

Keywords

conjoint analysis; hand amputation; hand transplant; prosthetic; shared decision-making

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the factors influencing the preference for a prosthesis or hand transplantation after unilateral hand amputation. The results showed that appearance and function were the most important factors for choosing a prosthesis, while concerns about immunosuppression side effects and the intense nature of surgery and recovery were predominant for hand transplantation. Age, medical experiences, familiarity with medical issues, and religious service attendance were associated with support for hand transplantation.
Introduction This study used a conjoint analysis-based survey to assess which factors are most influential when considering treatment with a prosthesis or transplant after a unilateral hand amputation. Methods Overall, 469 respondents were recruited using Amazon Mechanical Turk and asked to assume that they experienced a hand amputation. To determine preferences for a prosthetic, respondents chose among 11 pairs of alternatives with variations in the following attributes: appearance, function, maintenance, and learning time. Respondents were then presented with descriptions of the risks and outcomes of hand transplantation. The most compelling reasons for and against a transplant were determined and characteristics predictive of support for a transplant were identified. Results The most important attributes for a prosthesis were lifelike appearance and myolectric function. For hand transplantation, respondents were most concerned about immunosuppression side effects (n = 323, 69%) and the intense nature of surgery (n = 275, 59%), whereas the most positive benefit was the concept of the transplant being natural (n = 339, 72%). When faced with the choice of a hand transplant or a prosthetic, approximately 50% of respondents chose a transplantation. Younger age, previous medical experiences, a perceived familiarity with medical issues, and the regular attendance of religious services were associated with strong support for a hand transplantation (P < 0.01). Conclusions When considering a hand prosthesis, respondents are motivated most by appearance and function. Meanwhile, with hand transplantation, the risks of immunosuppression and the intense nature of surgery and recovery are predominant concerns. These findings may help inform patient-physician discussions when considering treatment after unilateral hand amputation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available