Journal
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages 463-474Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10600280211033022
Keywords
sedatives; hypnotics; primary care; prescription; deprescribing
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study suggests that patient education strategies can reduce the dose of sedative-hypnotics and policy interventions can effectively reduce medication use. Education and training for prescribers and patient engagement are key strategies, while decision support tools are less effective compared to prescriber education with patient engagement.
Objective: To describe interventions that target patient, provider, and system barriers to sedative-hypnotic (SH) deprescribing in the community and suggest strategies for healthcare teams. Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE ALL and EMBASE Classic + EMBASE (March 10, 2021). Study Selection and Data Extraction: English-language studies in primary care settings. Data Synthesis: 20 studies were themed as patient-related and prescriber inertia, physician skills and awareness, and health system constraints. Patient education strategies reduced SH dose for 10% to 62% of participants, leading to discontinuation in 13% to 80% of participants. Policy interventions reduced targeted medication use by 10% to 50%. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Patient engagement and empowerment successfully convince patients to deprescribe chronic SHs. Quality improvement strategies should also consider interventions directed at prescribers, including education and training, drug utilization reviews, or computer alerts indicating a potentially inappropriate prescription by medication, age, dose, or disease. Educational interventions were effective when they facilitated patient engagement and provided information on the harms and limited evidence supporting chronic use as well as the effectiveness of alternatives. Decision support tools were less effective than prescriber education with patient engagement, although they can be readily incorporated in the workflow through prescribing software. Conclusions: Several strategies with demonstrated efficacy in reducing SH use in community practice were identified. Education regarding SH risks, how to taper, and potential alternatives are essential details to provide to clinicians, patients, and families. The strategies presented can guide community healthcare teams toward reducing the community burden of SH use.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available