4.7 Article

Association between fecal methanogen species with methane production and grazed forage intake of beef heifers classified for residual feed intake under drylot conditions

Journal

ANIMAL
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100304

Keywords

Cattle; Feed efficiency; Greenhouse Gas; Pasture; Proxy

Funding

  1. Alberta Agriculture and Forestry
  2. Emissions Reduction Alberta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the diversity of fecal methanogen profiles among efficient and inefficient beef heifers and found that fecal methanogen profiles may be used to predict methane emissions in cattle.
Reduction in greenhouse gas emission from beef production is essential to the survival of the beef industry from environmental and social-economic perspectives. There are different systems available to measure methane from animals, but they are expensive, not easily accessible, and not suitable for large-scale methane measurements on the farm. Therefore exploring indicator traits, which are easy to measure, cost-effective, and suitable for large-scale measurement, are recommended. The objectives of this study were to examine the diversity of fecal methanogen profile among efficient and inefficient beef heifers on pasture and investigate methanogen profile as a possible proxy to predict methane emission in beef cattle consuming a forage diet. Forty pregnant (1st trimester) heifers previously classified for postweaning residual feed intake adjusted for off-test back fat (RFIfat; 20 high and 20 low) were included in this study. To determine individual pasture grazing intake, heifers were dosed with 1 kg of C-32 labeled pellets once per day from Day 0 to Day 12, and fecal samples were collected twice daily from Day 8 to Day 15. Fecal samples from Days 8, 10, and 12 were analyzed for their methanogen profile. Animals were monitored individually for methane and carbon dioxide production using a GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring system. Total methanogen population and methanogenic community diversity of fecal samples were not different (P > 0.1) between low and high RFIfat, groups, as measured by quantitative PCR and alpha- and beta-diversity indices. However, both groups had a different methanogen profile; the relative abundance of Methanobrevibacter wolinii and relatives were higher (P < 0.002), while that of Methanosphaera species ISO3-F5 was lower (P < 0.01) in low RFIfat, cattle compared to the high RFIfat, group. We also demonstrated that fecal methanogen profiles may be a useful proxy in predicting daily methane and carbon dioxide emissions with an adjusted R-2 of 0.53 and 0.33, respectively, for low RFIfat at heifers and 0.46 and 0.57, respectively, for the high RFIfat group. Crown Copyright (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available