4.3 Review

Prognostic Value of Baseline d-Dimer Level in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Journal

ANGIOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages 18-25

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00033197211019805

Keywords

d-dimer; coronary artery disease; mortality; major adverse cardiovascular events; meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that elevated baseline D-dimer levels in patients with coronary artery disease were associated with adverse outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).
The prognostic significance of d-dimer level in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is not fully established. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the association between elevated d-dimer level at baseline and adverse outcomes in patients with CAD. Two independent authors comprehensively searched PubMed and Embase databases from their inception to December 31, 2020. All observational studies reporting the values of baseline d-dimer level in predicting the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) or survival outcomes in patients with CAD were included. The prognostic values were calculated by pooling adjusted RR with 95% CI for the highest versus the lowest d-dimer level. Thirteen studies consisting of 25 600 patients with CAD were identified. Comparison between the highest and lowest d-dimer level showed that the pooled multivariable adjusted RR was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.53-1.86) for all-cause mortality, 2.37 (95% CI, 1.52-3.69) for cardiovascular mortality, and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.19-1.74) for MACEs, respectively. Elevated blood level of d-dimer at baseline was independently associated with higher risk of MACEs, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality in patients with CAD. The baseline d-dimer level may have important prognostic value in patients with CAD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available