4.8 Article

The Controllable Reconstruction of Bi-MOFs for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction through Electrolyte and Potential Mediation

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 60, Issue 33, Pages 18178-18184

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202104747

Keywords

catalyst design; CO2 reduction; controllable surface reconstruction; electrocatalysis; in situ characterization

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [FL170100154]
  2. Chinese CSC Scholarship Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the reconstruction of a Bi-based metal-organic framework for electrochemical CO2 reduction, demonstrating that controlling the intricate reconstruction process results in excellent activity and stability of the Bi catalyst, shedding light on the design of highly efficient electrocatalysts.
Monitoring and controlling the reconstruction of materials under working conditions is crucial for the precise identification of active sites, elucidation of reaction mechanisms, and rational design of advanced catalysts. Herein, a Bi-based metal-organic framework (Bi-MOF) for electrochemical CO2 reduction is selected as a case study. In situ Raman spectra combined with ex situ electron microscopy reveal that the intricate reconstruction of the Bi-MOF can be controlled using two steps: 1) electrolyte-mediated dissociation and conversion of Bi-MOF to Bi2O2CO3, and 2) potential-mediated reduction of Bi2O2CO3 to Bi. The intentionally reconstructed Bi catalyst exhibits excellent activity, selectivity, and durability for formate production, and the unsaturated surface Bi atoms formed during reconstruction become the active sites. This work emphasizes the significant impact of pre-catalyst reconstruction under working conditions and provides insight into the design of highly active and stable electrocatalysts through the regulation of these processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available