4.8 Article

Post-Synthetic Modification Unlocks a 2D-to-3D Switch in MOF Breathing Response: A Single-Crystal-Diffraction Mapping Study

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 60, Issue 33, Pages 17920-17924

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202105272

Keywords

anisotropy; breathing mode; metal-organic frameworks; post-synthetic modification; single crystals

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council [EP/G037477/1, EP/T034068/1]
  2. Diamond Light Source (DLS)
  3. University of Sheffield
  4. EPSRC [EP/T034068/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Post-synthetic modification of the interpenetrated diamondoid metal-organic framework leads to the transition from predominantly 2D breathing motion to a distinct 3D breathing motion. This indicates a decoupling of the pore-width and pore-length breathing motions, as revealed by single-crystal diffraction studies.
Post-synthetic modification (PSM) of the interpenetrated diamondoid metal-organic framework (Me2NH2)[In(BDC-NH2)(2)] (BDC-NH2=aminobenzenedicarboxylate) SHF-61 proceeds quantitatively in a single-crystal-to-single-crystal manner to yield the acetamide derivative (Me2NH2)[In(BDC-NHC(O)Me)(2)] SHF-62. Continuous breathing behaviour during activation/desolvation is retained upon PSM, but pore closing now leads to ring-flipping to avert steric clash of amide methyl groups of the modified ligands. This triggers a reduction in the amplitude of the breathing deformation in the two dimensions associated with pore diameter, but a large increase in the third dimension associated with pore length. The MOF is thereby converted from predominantly 2D breathing (in SHF-61) to a distinctly 3D breathing motion (in SHF-62) indicating a decoupling of the pore-width and pore-length breathing motions. These breathing motions have been mapped by a series of single-crystal diffraction studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available