4.5 Article

Raman spectroscopic quantification of tetrahedral boron in synthetic aluminum-rich tourmaline

Journal

AMERICAN MINERALOGIST
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages 872-882

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2138/am-2021-7758

Keywords

Tourmaline; high pressure; synthesis; tetrahedral boron; Raman; SIMS; Lithium; Beryllium and Boron: Quintessentially Crustal

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Fr 557/31-1, HE 2015/16-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Raman spectroscopy analysis of synthesized tourmalines revealed a correlation between tetrahedral boron content and OH-stretching band intensity, demonstrating its utility as a tool for quantifying tetrahedral boron in tourmaline. This knowledge is crucial for understanding B-isotope fractionation processes between tourmaline and fluid/melt, commonly used as a tracer for mass transfer processes.
The Raman spectra of five B-[4]-bearing tourmalines of different composition synthesized at 700 degrees C/4.0 GPa (including first-time synthesis of Na-Li-B-[4]-tourmaline, Ca-Li-B-[4]-tourmaline, and Ca-bearing square-B-[4]-tourmaline) reveal a strong correlation between the tetrahedral boron content and the summed relative intensity of all OH-stretching bands between 3300-3430 cm(-1). The band shift to low wavenumbers is explained by strong O3-H center dot center dot center dot O5 hydrogen bridge bonding. Applying the regression equation to natural B-[4]-bearing tourmaline from the Koralpe (Austria) reproduces the EMPA-derived value perfectly [EMPA: 0.67(12) B-[4] pfu vs. Raman: 0.66(13) B-[4] pfu]. This demonstrates that Raman spectroscopy provides a fast and easy-to-use tool for the quantification of tetrahedral boron in tourmaline. The knowledge of the amount of tetrahedral boron in tourmaline has important implications for the better understanding and modeling of B-isotope fractionation between tourmaline and fluid/melt, widely used as a tracer of mass transfer processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available