4.4 Article

The FSHR G-29A variant is not associated with the ovarian response to exogenous FSH stimulation

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aji.13500

Keywords

FSH receptor; granulosa cell; ovarian response; SNV

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81771655, 81571503]
  2. Innovation-Oriented Science and Technology Grant from NHC Key Laboratory of Reproduction Regulation [CX2017-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the genetic variant at position -29 of the FSHR gene is not associated with the ovarian response to exogenous FSH stimulation in Chinese women, but low ovarian response may be caused by decreased FSHR expression.
A common genetic variant in the follicle stimulating hormone receptor gene (FSHR) 5 '-untranslated region has been previously reported to influence FSHR gene expression. However, studies on the ovarian response to exogenous gonadotropin stimulation are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of variants at positions -29 of the FSHR gene with the ovarian response to exogenous FSH stimulation in Chinese women. The genotypes of the FSHR gene were assayed using the Sequenom MassARRAY system. Total RNA and protein was extracted from granulosa cells, and FSHR expression at the mRNA and protein levels was assessed using quantitative PCR and western blotting. Our data revealed that there was no association between the FSHR genotype at the -29 position and the outcome of controlled ovarian stimulation. The expression of FSHR, at both the mRNA and protein levels, was similar amongst the different FSHR genotypes assessed, but was significantly reduced in the low responders. These results indicate that the variants caused by mutations at position -29 are not associated with ovarian response, and the low ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation may be caused by decreased FSHR expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available