4.6 Article

Balancing Consideration of the Risks and Benefits of E-Cigarettes

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 111, Issue 9, Pages 1661-1672

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306416

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The topic of e-cigarettes is controversial, with focus on balancing the risks for young people and the potential for assisting smokers to quit. Public perception often sees e-cigarette use as equally or more dangerous than smoking, despite research suggesting otherwise. Policymakers need to weigh how to reduce youth vaping while increasing the likelihood of adult smoking cessation.
The topic of e-cigarettes is controversial. Opponents focus on e-cigarettes' risks for young people, while supporters emphasize the potential for e-cigarettes to assist smokers in quitting smoking. Most US health organizations, media coverage, and policymakers have focused primarily on risks to youths. Because of their messaging, much of the public-including most smokers-now consider e-cigarette use as dangerous as or more dangerous than smoking. By contrast, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine concluded that e-cigarette use is likely far less hazardous than smoking. Policies intended to reduce adolescent vaping may also reduce adult smokers' use of e-cigarettes in quit attempts. Because evidence indicates that e-cigarette use can increase the odds of quitting smoking, many scientists, including this essay's authors, encourage the health community, media, and policymakers to more carefully weigh vapings potential to reduce adult smoking-attributable mortality. We review the health risks of e-cigarette use, the likelihood that vaping increases smoking cessation, concerns about youth vaping, and the need to balance valid concerns about risks to youths with the potential benefits of increasing adult smoking cessation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available