Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 233, Issue -, Pages 101-110Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.06.020
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Stichting Macula Fonds
- Retina Nederland Onderzoek Fonds
- Stichting Blinden-Penning
- Algemene Nederlandse Vereniging ter Voorkoming van Blindheid
- Landelijke Stichting voor Blinden en Slechtzienden
- Oogfonds
- Rotterdamse Stichting Blindenbelangen (Rotterdam, the Netherlands)
- Stichting Leids Oogheelkundig Ondersteuningsfonds (Leiden, the Netherlands)
- Haagse Stichting Blindenhulp (The Hague, the Netherlands)
- Stichting Ooglijders (Rotterdam, the Netherlands)
- Gisela Thier Fellowship of Leiden University, Leiden
- Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VENI)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compared the efficacy and safety of half-dose photodynamic therapy and eplerenone therapy for treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. The results showed that half-dose PDT was superior to eplerenone treatment in terms of short-term safety and efficacy outcomes.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety between half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) and eplerenone therapy for treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC). DESIGN: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: This investigator-initiated trial was conducted in 3 academic medical centers in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either indocyanine green angiography-guided half dose PDT or oral eplerenone for 12 weeks. Both anatomical and functional outcomes were evaluated at 3 months after the start of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were randomly assigned to receive either half-dose PDT (n = 53) or eplerenone treatment (n = 54). Thirteen patients (3 in the PDT group and 10 in the eplerenone group) did not adhere to the study protocol. At the 3-month evaluation visit, 78% of patients in the PDT group had complete resolution of subretinal fluid accumulation compared to only 17% of patients in the eplerenone group (P < .001). Mean best-corrected visual acuity in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at the 3-month evaluation visit was 83.7 +/- 10.8 and 82.8 +/- 9.0 in the PDT and eplerenone groups, respectively (P = .555). In addition, mean retinal sensitivity on microperimetry was 25.4 +/- 3.4 dB and 23.9 +/- 4.0 dB in the PDT and eplerenone groups, respectively (P = .041). Finally, mean vision related quality of life scores were 87.2 +/- 8.5 and 83.8 +/- 12.1 in the PDT and eplerenone groups, respectively (P = .094). Three patients (6%) in the PDT group experienced adverse events during the study compared to 18 patients (33%) in the eplerenone group. CONCLUSIONS: Half-dose PDT is superior to oral eplerenone for cCSC with respect to both short-term safety and efficacy outcomes. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available