Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 191, Issue 1, Pages 182-187Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab228
Keywords
bias; cohort studies; epidemiologic methods; regression analysis
Categories
Funding
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health [R01OH011409]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study highlights that the net bias in an estimation of the association of interest may increase when adjusting for confounders in the presence of classical exposure measurement error.
Observational epidemiologic studies typically face challenges of exposure measurement error and confounding. Consider an observational study of the association between a continuous exposure and an outcome, where the exposure variable of primary interest suffers from classical measurement error (i.e., the measured exposures are distributed around the true exposure with independent error). In the absence of exposure measurement error, it is widely recognized that one should control for confounders of the association of interest to obtain an unbiased estimate of the effect of that exposure on the outcome of interest. However, here we show that, in the presence of classical exposure measurement error, the net bias in an estimate of the association of interest may increase upon adjustment for confounders. We offer an analytical expression for calculating the change in net bias in an estimate of the association of interest upon adjustment for a confounder in the presence of classical exposure measurement error, and we illustrate this problem using simulations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available