4.5 Article

Recommendations for Vaccination in Children with Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Dupilumab: A Consensus Meeting, 2020

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 443-455

Publisher

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40257-021-00607-6

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dupilumab is currently the only biologic therapy approved in Europe and the United States for severe atopic dermatitis in patients aged 6 and above, with off-label use debated in younger children. Decision-making regarding vaccination for children on dupilumab is complex, dependent on various factors, highlighting the need for further research on the impact of dupilumab on immune responses to vaccines.
Dupilumab is the only biologic therapy currently approved in Europe and the United States for severe atopic dermatitis in patients 6 years of age or older. Off-label use is rationalized in younger children with severe atopic dermatitis. Decisions about vaccination for children on dupilumab are complex and depend on both the child's current treatment and the type of vaccination required. To achieve consensus on recommendations for vaccination of pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis treated with or planning to start dupilumab, a review of the literature and a modified-Delphi process was conducted by a working group of 5 panelists with expertise in dermatology, immunology, infectious diseases and vaccination. Here, we provide seven recommendations for vaccination of pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis treated with or planning to start dupilumab. These recommendations serve to guide physicians' decisions about vaccination in children with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab. Furthermore, we highlight an unmet need for research to determine how significantly dupilumab affects cellular and humoral immune responses to vaccination with live attenuated and inactivated vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available