4.7 Article

Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Herbal Medicine on Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
Volume 49, Issue 7, Pages 1557-1575

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0192415X21500737

Keywords

Clinical Efficacy; Chinese Herbal Medicine; Breast Cancer; Clinical Trials; Complementary Medicine; Meta-Analysis; Review

Funding

  1. Gaia Family Trust for Modern Oncology of Chinese Medicine [200007008]
  2. Research Grant Council, HKSAR [RGC GRF 17152116]
  3. Innovation and Technology Commission: The 2nd Phase of Integrative Joint Organizational Platform (IJOP) Disease Collaborative Panel [200009062]
  4. Health and Medical Research Fund [15162961, 16172751, 17181101]
  5. [200006276]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluating the clinical effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) on breast cancer found that combined therapy with CHM and Western medicine could improve tumor response and survival rates. Further studies with stratification of tumor stages and intervention types are highly warranted to explore the potential benefits of complementary CHM therapy for breast cancer patients.
Breast cancer is currently the most common cancer in women, and it accounts for 11.6% of all cancer diagnoses in 2018. Breast cancer patients frequently resort to alternative medicine in addition to conventional Western therapy. This study is to evaluate clinical effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) on breast cancer by conducting meta-analyses on 81 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 7215 subjects from eight databases. All RCTs compared patients using Western therapy alone and those using additional CHM therapy to evaluate the difference of primary (tumor response, mean time to progression (mTTP), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS)) and secondary outcome measures (tumor markers). Results showed that under the RECIST1.1 criteria, 52% patients with additional CHM therapy (67%, under WHO criteria) achieved either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), compared to 38% patients with Western therapy alone (53%, under the WHO criteria). The risk ratio was 1.31 (p < 0.00001, 95% CI = 1.15-1.50) for patients with CHM plus Western therapy and 1.25 (p < 0.00001, 95% CI = 1.18-1.98) for those with Western therapy. Moreover, patients with complementary CHM therapy were associated with an mTTP of 2.79 months longer (p < 0.00001) and an OS of 1.90 months longer (p < 0.00001); they also had an increase in 3-year PFS (p= 0.002), 2- (p= 0.0002) and 5-year (p= 0.006) OS rates. Therefore, complementary CHM therapy might demonstrate clinical benefits for breast cancer patients in terms of tumor response and survival. Clinical studies with further stratification of tumor stages and intervention types are highly warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available