4.3 Article

Small aircraft detection using deep learning

Journal

AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 4, Pages 671-681

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/AEAT-11-2020-0259

Keywords

Deep learning; Artificial neural networks; Computer vision; Target tracking

Funding

  1. Eskisehir Technical University Scientific Research Projects Commission [20ADP234]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the tracking algorithm based on deep learning and four deep learning tracking models, comparing them to prevent collision and achieve target tracking in autonomous aircraft. Among the four models (DCNN, DCNNFN, TLDCNN, and FNDCNNTL), FNDCNNTL had the shortest training time and nearly 100% accuracy rate.
Purpose The paper aims to address the tracking algorithm based on deep learning and four deep learning tracking models developed. They compared with each other to prevent collision and to obtain target tracking in autonomous aircraft. Design/methodology/approach First, to follow the visual target, the detection methods were used and then the tracking methods were examined. Here, four models (deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN), deep convolutional neural networks with fine-tuning (DCNNFN), transfer learning with deep convolutional neural network (TLDCNN) and fine-tuning deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning (FNDCNNTL)) were developed. Findings The training time of DCNN took 9 min 33 s, while the accuracy percentage was calculated as 84%. In DCNNFN, the training time of the network was calculated as 4 min 26 s and the accuracy percentage was 91%. The training of TLDCNN) took 34 min and 49 s and the accuracy percentage was calculated as 95%. With FNDCNNTL, the training time of the network was calculated as 34 min 33 s and the accuracy percentage was nearly 100%. Originality/value Compared to the results in the literature ranging from 89.4% to 95.6%, using FNDCNNTL, better results were found in the paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available