4.6 Article

Radial diffusion model for fragrance materials: Prediction and validation

Journal

AICHE JOURNAL
Volume 67, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17351

Keywords

evaporation; Fick's second law; headspace; mathematical modeling; perfume

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A predictive model based on Fick's second law for radial diffusion was proposed and validated for modeling the diffusion of fragrance materials. The study combined the UNIFAC group contribution method with the Fickian radial diffusion approach, providing an efficient and validated tool to assess the radial diffusion of fragrance and volatile systems. The numerical simulation showed good adherence to experimental gas concentration data, demonstrating the accuracy and reliability of the proposed methodology.
A predictive model based on Fick's second law for radial diffusion is proposed and validated for modeling the diffusion of fragrance materials. A pure component, two binary systems, and a ternary system were used for validation. The model combines the prediction model to represent the liquid phase nonidealities, using the UNIFAC group contribution method, with the Fickian radial diffusion approach. The experimental headspace concentrations were measured in a diffusion chamber using the solid-phase microextraction technique and quantified using gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector. The numerical solutions were obtained along with an analytical model considering constant surface concentration. The odor intensities of the studied systems were calculated using Stevens' power law and the strongest component model, respectively. The numerical simulation presented good adherence to the experimental gas concentration data. The proposed methodology is an efficient and validated tool to assess the radial diffusion of fragrance and volatile systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available