4.6 Article

Flow regimes in a gas-liquid-solid three-phase moving bed

Journal

AICHE JOURNAL
Volume 67, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17374

Keywords

flow behavior; flow regime transition; moving particles; particle velocity; three-phase moving bed

Funding

  1. ExxonMobil Research and Engineering
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21808197]
  3. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China [61621002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that as particle velocity increased, flow channels became more pronounced with transitions between different initial flow regimes occurring at moderate-to-high particle velocities. The flow regime map of the three-phase moving bed showed an increase in trickle flow region and a decrease in bubble flow region, making it suitable for reactions requiring operation in pulse flow, bubble flow, and transition zones.
The gas-liquid-solid three-phase moving beds could supply a potential solution for multiphase reactions with catalyst easily deactivated, and the flow regimes in it were studied by optical method and pressure drop measurement. Results showed that taking the trickle flow as the initial flow regime, the flow channels were more obvious as the particle velocity increased. When the initial flow regimes were pulse flow and bubble flow respectively, the pulse-to-trickle and bubble-to-pulse flow transitions mainly occurred at moderate-to-high particle velocities (0.01-0.04 m s(-1) under conditions used in this work). Moreover, the flow regime map in the three-phase moving bed was constructed and shown that the region of trickle flow increased and the region of bubble flow decreased. Finally, the application of three-phase moving beds was discussed, and it could be suitable for those reactions, which had to operate in the pulse flow, bubble flow, and transition zone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available