4.5 Article

Identification of Nonlinear Stiffness and Damping Parameters Using a Hybrid Approach

Journal

AIAA JOURNAL
Volume 59, Issue 11, Pages 4686-4695

Publisher

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/1.J060461

Keywords

Stiffness; State Space Representation; Nonlinear Systems; Damping Coefficient; Frequency Response Functions; Three Degrees of Freedom; Dynamic Response; Singular Value Decomposition; Structural Nonlinearities; Numerical Integration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A hybrid nonlinear identification approach combining the restoring force surface method and the nonlinear subspace identification method is proposed in this study. It can confidently identify the nonlinear coefficients associated with stiffness and damping nonlinearities, and works well under different noise-level contaminations.
Robustly identifying nonlinear mechanical systems is generally a challenging task, and this is particularly true when the structure under test exhibits nonlinear behaviors related to both stiffness and damping. In this work, a hybrid nonlinear identification approach is proposed by combining the restoring force surface (RFS) method and the nonlinear subspace identification method. The multiparameter nonlinear identification strategy is based on a first characterization conducted using the RFS method, followed by a nonlinear state-space representation using subspace algorithms. Two common friction simulation examples and one complex multi-degree-of-freedom system are employed to verify the proposed method. The effect of the measurement noise on the parameter estimation results is investigated by corrupting the previously generated output, adding different levels of Gaussian zero-mean noise. Results show that the nonlinear coefficients associated with the stiffness and damping nonlinearities can be identified with a high level of confidence, and the proposed method works well under different noise-level contaminations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available