4.4 Article

Winning hearts and minds through a policy promoting the agroecological paradigm in universities

Journal

AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 5-18

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-021-10223-z

Keywords

Symbolic power; Agroecology; Transdisciplinary; Higher education; Brazil; State

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)-Brazil [564229/2010-5, 487555/2013-9, 472894/2014-15, 472509/2014-4, 472738/2014-3]
  2. SAo Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2017/04577-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper evaluates the impact of Brazilian agroecology policies on education, specifically focusing on NEAs. The support for establishing NEAs has the potential to redistribute symbolic power within and outside universities, promoting the legitimacy of agroecology. By studying the activities of NEAs, it can be observed that they play a crucial role in disputed social fields and training individuals in integrative and transdisciplinary thinking.
Brazil stands out at the global level for having implemented several policies intending to promote agroecology as a productive paradigm for small-holder farmers. However, the impacts of this process of institutionalization of agroecology still lack research and debates that evaluate the effectiveness of these policies. In this paper, we assess and discuss the impacts of a policy specifically focused on education in agroecology, the support to the establishment of Centers for the Study of Agroecology and Organic Production (NEAs) in more than 150 higher education institutions throughout Brazil. NEAs bring together teachers, researchers, and students who engage in teaching, research, and extension activities in partnerships with peasant farmers, their organizations, and rural extension workers. The hypothesis that guides our analysis is that this support to establish NEAs allowed redistribution of symbolic power in the universities where they were established, supporting agroecology to gain greater legitimacy inside and outside the university field. Based on an in-depth study of four NEAs, performed through participant observation and documentary analysis, the NEAs are evaluated from the perspective of social fields in dispute, first in a university sphere, but also from the perspective of training people in integrative and transdisciplinary thinking that will contest the industrial-corporate food regime. Our findings suggest that the State support to university groups dedicated to the promotion of agroecology has allowed the construction of what we have named agroecological spaces, which symbolically dispute the dominant paradigms in educational institutions, supporting the constitution of material and immaterial agroecological territories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available