4.6 Article

Thinner Sea Ice Contribution to the Remarkable Polynya Formation North of Greenland in August 2018

Journal

ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Volume 38, Issue 9, Pages 1474-1485

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-021-0136-9

Keywords

polynya; sea ice thickness; wind; sea ice drift; Greenland

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1407206]
  2. Academy of Finland [317999]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [317999, 317999] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In August 2018, a remarkable polynya was observed off the north coast of Greenland, formed due to the thinnest sea ice cover and modest southerly wind caused by a positive North Atlantic Oscillation. The opening mechanism of this polynya differs from the one formed in the same area in February 2018, with sea ice drift patterns becoming more responsive to atmospheric forcing due to thinning of sea ice cover in this region.
In August 2018, a remarkable polynya was observed off the north coast of Greenland, a perennial ice zone where thick sea ice cover persists. In order to investigate the formation process of this polynya, satellite observations, a coupled ice-ocean model, ocean profiling data, and atmosphere reanalysis data were applied. We found that the thinnest sea ice cover in August since 1978 (mean value of 1.1 m, compared to the average value of 2.8 m during 1978-2017) and the modest southerly wind caused by a positive North Atlantic Oscillation (mean value of 0.82, compared to the climatological value of -0.02) were responsible for the formation and maintenance of this polynya. The opening mechanism of this polynya differs from the one formed in February 2018 in the same area caused by persistent anomalously high wind. Sea ice drift patterns have become more responsive to the atmospheric forcing due to thinning of sea ice cover in this region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available