4.6 Article

Quantification of the Knudsen Effect on the Effective Gas Diffusion Coefficient in Partially Saturated Pore Distributions

Journal

ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adem.202100106

Keywords

effective gas diffusion coefficient; gas transport in porous media; knudsen diffusion; moisture transport; nanopores

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantifies the influence of partially saturated pores on gas diffusion by investigating different pore geometries and size distributions. It demonstrates that water layer thickness significantly affects effective diffusion for pore radii below 50 nm.
The effective gas diffusion coefficient describes the process of gas diffusion in porous materials. Several materials have a significant number of micropores in the lower nanometre range leading to a reduction of gas diffusion (Knudsen effect). In the case of partial pore saturation during adsorption, the available pore space is further reduced, as is the gas diffusion. In this study, the influence of partially saturated pores on the Knudsen effect and on the gas diffusion is quantified. Three different pore geometries are investigated (slit, cylindrical and spherical pores) and three different types of pore size distribution, including a broad equal distribution, three narrow normal distributions and two measured distributions of concrete. Besides the intensive computation of the exact pore saturation, a simplified model with low computational requirements is suggested. This study shows that the influence of the water layer thickness on the effective diffusion becomes significant for pore radii below 50 nm and the assumed pore geometry is important. At the end, the overall effect is quantified for an amorphous material with most pore radii below 30 nm. At a moisture level of 50% relative humidity, the effective diffusion is reduced by 35% due to partial saturation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available