4.7 Review

The role of microneedle arrays in drug delivery and patient monitoring to prevent diabetes induced fibrosis

Journal

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.06.002

Keywords

Diabetes; End-organ complications; Microneedle-mediated transdermal delivery; Minimally invasive devices; Insulin delivery systems; Glucose monitoring; Interstitial fluid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diabetes affects 450 million adults worldwide, with chronic hyperglycaemia potentially leading to fibrosis; Microneedle arrays offer a promising alternative for transdermal drug delivery; The potential of microneedle technology in revolutionizing diabetes management is significant.
Diabetes affects approximately 450 million adults globally. If not effectively managed, chronic hyperglycaemia causes tissue damage that can develop into fibrosis. Fibrosis leads to end-organ complications, failure of organ systems occurs, which can ultimately cause death. One strategy to tackle end-organ complications is to maintain normoglycaemia. Conventionally, insulin is administered subcutaneously. Whilst effective, this delivery route shows several limitations, including pain. The transdermal route is a favourable alternative. Microneedle (MN) arrays are minimally invasive and painless devices that can enhance transdermal drug delivery. Convincing evidence is provided on MN-mediated insulin delivery. MN arrays can also be used as a diagnostic tool and monitor glucose levels. Furthermore, sophisticated MN array-based systems that integrate glucose monitoring and drug delivery into a single device have been designed. Therefore, MN technology has potential to revolutionise diabetes management. This review describes the current applications of MN technology for diabetes management and how these could prevent diabetes induced fibrosis. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available