4.0 Article

GERMINATION, STOMATAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF ROCKET (Eruca sativa L.) TO SALINITY

Journal

ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM-HORTORUM CULTUS
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 135-144

Publisher

UNIV LIFE SCIENCES LUBLIN
DOI: 10.24326/asphc.2021.4.12

Keywords

Eruca sativa L; NaCl; germination; membrane stability; ion leakage

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The response of rocket seedlings to salinity stress was studied by evaluating various germination and physiological parameters. Results showed that salinity stress decreased germination percentage, germination index and stress tolerance index, while mean germination time increased. Different cultivars exhibited varying degrees of tolerance to salinity, with Istanbul being more tolerant than Ilica.
The response of rocket (Eruca sativa L.) to salinity stress was tested for several germination and physiological parameters during seedling development. Two rocket cultivars (Ilica and Istanbul) and various salinity stresses of 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 dS m(-1) created by NaCl were used in the study. Germination percentage (GP), mean germination time (MGT), germination index (GI), germination stress tolerance index (GSTI), stomata morphology, chlorophyll content (SPAD value), leaf dry matter, relative water content (RWC), cellular injury (CI) and cell membrane stability (CMS) were evaluated. Results showed that high salinity stresses led to a decrease in GP, GI and GSTI index, while MGT increased. Salinity reduced stoma length and pore length. Under saline conditions, leaf dry matter, chlorophyll content and CMS increased, while RWC decreased. Also, CI was enhanced by salinities over 10 dS m(-1). It was concluded that lower CMS, CI and RWC, and greater dry matter and chlorophyll were considered as salinity tolerance at the seedling stage of the rocket, and Istanbul was more tolerant to salinity than Ilica.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available