Microsurgical management of midbrain cavernous malformations: does lesion depth influence the outcome?

Background The purpose of this study was to clarify whether the intrinsic depth of midbrain cavernous malformations (MCMs) influenced the surgical outcome. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective study of 76 consecutive patients who underwent microsurgical resection of a MCM. The vascular lesions were categorized into 4 distinct groups based on how these lesions had altered the brainstem surface. Additionally, it was verified whether the actual aspect of the brainstem surface could be predicted only by evaluating the pertinent preoperative MRI slices. Clinical outcome was assessed by determining the modified Rankin Scale Score (mRS) before and after surgery. Results Twenty-three MCMs (30.3%) were located deeply within the midbrain. The overlying midbrain surface appeared to be normal (group nl). In 33 patients (43.4%), the midbrain surface showed only a yellowish discoloration (group yw). In another 14 individuals (18.4%), the midbrain surface was distorted by the underlying MCM and bulging out while the vascular lesion still remained covered by a thin parenchymal layer (group bg). In the smallest group comprising 6 patients (7.9%), the exophytic MCM had disrupted the midbrain surface and was clearly visible at microsurgical exposure (group ex). The mean mRS decreased in the group nl from 1.43 preoperatively to 0.61 at follow-up. Conclusion This study demonstrates in a large patient population that a deep intrinsic MCM location is not necessarily associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome after microsurgical lesionectomy. Predicting the aspect of the midbrain surface by evaluating preoperative MR images alone was not sufficiently reliable.

Automated summary

The study found that a deep intrinsic MCM location does not necessarily lead to unfavorable clinical outcomes after microsurgical lesionectomy in a large patient population. Predicting the aspect of the midbrain surface based solely on preoperative MR images was not reliable enough.