4.1 Article

The influences of micro- and macro-habitat variables on tent-roosting in Dermanura watsoni on the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica

Journal

ACTA CHIROPTEROLOGICA
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 207-213

Publisher

MUSEUM & INST ZOOLOGY PAS-POLISH ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3161/15081109ACC2021.23.1.017

Keywords

Dermanura watsoni; Thomas's fruit-eating bat; bat roost; roosting requirements; roosting ecology; roost selection; tent-building

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution of bat tents is influenced by proximity to freshwater, with 48.8% of tents located within 100m of freshwater resources, and D. watsoni prefers to construct tents in sheltered habitats with a high cover abundance of trees. These types of habitat areas should be targeted for conservation efforts to protect this species.
Bats spend half of their lives in their roosts, which play vital roles in the life histories of the bats that occupy them. More than half of all bat species roost in foliage. Within the Neotropics, 17 species of bat are known to modify foliage into structures referred to as 'tents'. Of these species, Thomas's fruit eating bat (Dermanura watsoni) uses the widest range of plant species for roosts, constructing five different tent types. However, the factors influencing the distribution and quantity of tents are not fully understood for this species. The aims of our study were to investigate whether (1) micro-habitat characteristics influence the number of tents on individual plants and (2) macro-habitat features influence the frequency of plants used for tent-roosting in the surrounding landscape. Our results demonstrate that the distribution of tents was influenced by proximity to freshwater, with 48.8% of tents within 100 m of freshwater resources. Additionally, D. watsoni constructed tents in sheltered habitats with a high cover abundance of trees. These types of habitat areas should be targeted for conservation efforts to conserve this species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available