4.5 Article

A three-year longitudinal study on the use of pre-ordering in a university canteen

Journal

APPETITE
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105203

Keywords

Food services; Choice behavior; Sustainability; Food waste; Healthy eating; Technology acceptance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the use of pre-ordering meal systems and found that adoption was highest among graduate female students. The research also suggested that pre-ordering may increase the amount of uncollected orders, providing new insights for future literature.
Meal pre-planning is considered a cost-effective behavioral strategy that can improve eating habits, reduce food waste and benefit food operators. This work aimed to offer new insights on the use of meal pre-ordering systems, in particular with regard to younger generations' booking habits and their evolution over time. Our data included observations from 946 students who visited a university canteen over the course of three years. We tried to address questions that were not previously explored in a real setting, namely we analyzed how widespread the use of pre-ordering can be, how much in advance and for how many days users plan their meals, whether there exists a compensation effect for those who order in advance and if increased familiarity with this booking system influences its adoption over time. We found that the adoption of pre-ordering was highest among graduate female students (odds ratio 1.67, p < 0.001), who also planned their lunches further in advance and for more consecutive days compared to their peers. Our data also suggested that pre-ordering may increase the amount of uncollected orders, a potential source of collateral waste previously not identified in the literature. Although the generalizability of our findings is limited by the unique characteristics of the setting, the results obtained provide novel cues upon which future literature may build.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available