4.8 Article

Electrically Controlled Thermal Radiation from Reduced Graphene Oxide Membranes

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 13, Issue 23, Pages 27278-27283

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c04352

Keywords

graphene oxide; membrane; graphene optoelectronics; electrolyte gating; thermal camouflage; thermal radiation

Funding

  1. NRF (Singapore) [R-723-000-001-281]
  2. EU Flagship Programs [CNECTICT-604391, 2D-SIPC]
  3. European Research Council Synergy Grant Hetero2D
  4. Royal Society
  5. EPSRC [EP/N010345/1, EP/P026850/1, EP/S030719/1]
  6. [075-00355-21-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates a fabrication process of hybrid devices that can control thermal radiation from the device surface through electrically driven reversible ionic intercalation. The main mechanism leading to the reduction of light emission was identified as Pauli blocking. Additionally, the study examines the devices' potential as a platform for electrically controlling mid-infrared photonics.
We demonstrate a fabrication procedure of hybrid devices that consist of reduced graphene oxide films supported by porous polymer membranes that host ionic solutions. We find that we can control the thermal radiation from the surface of reduced graphene oxide through a process of electrically driven reversible ionic intercalation. Through a comparative analysis of the structural, chemical, and optical properties of our reduced graphene oxide films, we identify that the dominant mechanism leading to the intercalation-induced reduction of light emission is Pauli blocking of the interband recombination of charge carriers. We inspect the capabilities of our devices to act as a platform for the electrical control of mid-infrared photonics by observing a bias-induced reduction of apparent temperature of hot surfaces visualized through an infrared thermal camera.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available