4.8 Article

Understanding the Effect of Al Doping on the Electrochemical Performance Improvement of the LiMn2O4 Cathode Material

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 13, Issue 38, Pages 45446-45454

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c11315

Keywords

Li-ion batteries; spinel LiMn2O4; Al3+ doping; STEM; electron beam irradiation

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0303403]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan [19JC1416700]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61974042, 11774092]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Al doping improves the electrochemical performance of spinel LiMn2O4 by forming a more stable structure framework, inhibiting the dissolution of Mn ions, and enhancing cycling stability and rate performance.
It is well known that the electrochemical performance of spinel LiMn2O4 can be improved by Al doping. Herein, combining X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy, and spherical aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (Cs-STEM) with in situ electron-beam (E-beam) irradiation techniques, the influence of Al doping on the structural evolution and stability improvement of the LiMn2O4 cathode material is revealed. It is revealed that an appropriate concentration of Al3+ ions could dope into the spinel structure to form a more stable LiAlxMn2-xO4 phase framework, which can effectively stabilize the surface and bulk structure by inhibiting the dissolution of Mn ions during cycling. The optimized LiAl0.05Mn1.95O4 sample exhibits a superior capacity retention ratio of 80% after 1000 cycles at 10 C (1 C = 148 mA h g(-1)) in the voltage range of 3.0-4.5 V, which possesses an initial discharge capacity of 90.3 mA h g(-1). Compared with the undoped LiMn2O4 sample, the Al-doped sample also shows superior rate performance, especially the capacity recovery performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available