4.8 Article

Tuning Metal Elements in Open Frameworks for Efficient Oxygen Evolution and Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 13, Issue 36, Pages 42715-42723

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c10441

Keywords

metal atomic insertion; Prussian blue analogue framework; oxygen reduction reaction (ORR); oxygen evolution reaction (OER); hydrogen peroxide

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-19-1-0296]
  2. Department of Energy, BES [DE-SC0012547]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical methods hold promise for future clean energy storage and conversion, with most involving oxygen reactions. A facile synthesis method for highly efficient oxygen evolution and reduction catalysts has been reported, with CoNi-PBA-2 catalyst showing the highest activity for OER and Zn-PBA catalysts demonstrating high selectivity in ORR. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations confirm the high selectivity of Zn-PBA towards H2O2 in ORR.
Electrochemical methods are promising technical routes for future clean energy storage and conversion. Most of the electrochemical methods involve oxygen reactions. Unfavorable kinetics and sluggish reactions are the main challenges for these processes. We report here a facile synthesis of highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts. The catalysts are synthesized through the fine-tuning of metal ions (M, specifically Co, Ni, Zn, and Cu) in Prussian blue analogues (PBAs) and thus termed as M-PBAs. The CoNi-PBA-2 catalyst shows the highest activity toward OER with an onset potential at 280 mV and a Tafel slope of 63 mV dec(-1). Zn-PBA catalysts demonstrate high selectivity in two-electron-transfer ORR The H2O2 yield is as high as 88% at 0 V vs RHE. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations also confirm the high selectivity of Zn-PBA toward H2O2 in ORR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available