4.8 Article

Evaluation of an Ionic Porous Organic Polymer for Water Remediation

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 13, Issue 33, Pages 39404-39413

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c10464

Keywords

cationic porous organic polymer; anionic pollutants; organic pollutants; adsorption; selectivity

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2020QB035]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21601103, 51572136, 51772162]
  3. Taishan Scholars Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The novel ionic porous organic polymer QUST-iPOP-1 exhibited high permanent porosity and wide pore size distribution, enabling efficient removal of environmentally toxic oxo-anions and anionic organic dyes from water. It also showed ultra-high capacity values for certain anions, comparable to compounds from exhaustive research, even in the presence of other concurrent anions.
The targeted synthesis of a novel ionic porous organic polymer (iPOP) was reported. The compound (denoted as QUST-iPOP-1) was built up through a quaternization reaction of tris(4-imidazolylphenyl)amine and cyanuric chloride, and then benzyl bromide was added to complete the quaternization of the total imidazolyl units. It featured a special exchangeable Cl-/Br(-)rich structure with high permanent porosity and wide pore size distribution, enabling it to rapidly and effectively remove environmentally toxic oxo-anions including Cr2O72-, MnO4-, and ReO4- and anionic organic dyes with different sizes including methyl blue, Congo red, and methyl orange from water. Notably, QUST-iPOP-1 showed ultra-high capacity values for radioactive TcO4- surrogate anions (MnO4- and ReO4-), Cr2O72-, methyl blue, and Congo red, and these were comparable to some reported compounds of exhaustive research. Furthermore, the relative removal rate was high even when other concurrent anions existed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available