4.8 Article

Bimetallic Sulfide SnS2/FeS2 Nanosheets as High-Performance Anode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 13, Issue 33, Pages 39248-39256

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c08801

Keywords

sodium-ion batteries; anode materials; bimetallic sulfide; nanosheets; high-performance

Funding

  1. Nanotechnology Platform Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [JPMXP09F19-FA-0029]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772039, 51972293]
  3. KAGENHI [19H02818]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SnS2/FeS2/rGO composite material shows superior electrochemical performance in sodium-ion batteries, with high cycle stability and rate performance.
Transition-metal sulfide SnS2 has aroused wide concern due to its high capacity and nanosheet structure, making it an attractive choice as the anode material in sodium-ion batteries. However, the large volume expansion and poor conductivity of SnS2 lead to inferior cycle stability as well as rate performance. In this work, FeS2 was in situ introduced to synchronously grow with SnS2 on rGO to prepare a heterojunction bimetallic sulfide nanosheet SnS2/FeS2/rGO composite. The composition and distinctive structure facilitate the rapid diffusion of Na+ and improve the charge transfer at the heterogeneous interface, providing sufficient space for volume expansion and improving anode materials' structural stability. SnS2/FeS2/rGO bimetallic sulfide electrode boasts a capacity of 768.3 mA h g(-1) at the current density of 0.1 A g(-1), and 541.2 mA h g(-1) at the current density of 1 A g(-1) in sodium-ion batteries, which is superior to that of either single metal sulfide SnS2 or FeS2. TDOS calculation further confirms that the binding of FeS2/SnS2-Na is more stable than FeS2 and SnS2 alone. The superior electrochemical performance of the SnS2/FeS2/rGO composite material makes it a promising candidate for sodium storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available