4.8 Article

Nano-Confinement of Insulating Sulfur in the Cathode Composite of All-Solid-State Li-S Batteries Using Flexible Carbon Materials with Large Pore Volumes

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 13, Issue 32, Pages 38613-38622

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c10275

Keywords

nanoporous carbon; 3D graphene; lithium-sulfur battery; all-solid-state battery; large pore volume

Funding

  1. [19K15281]
  2. [17H01042]
  3. [19H00913]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using nanoporous graphene with a large pore volume as the cathode support material, durable nanostructured cathode materials for efficient all-solid-state Li-S batteries were successfully prepared. The electrochemical performances of the batteries were significantly improved and feasible under harsh conditions, with the highest specific capacity achieved under high sulfur loading.
Durable nanostructured cathode materials for efficient all-solid-state Li-S batteries were prepared using a conductive single-walled 3D graphene with a large pore volume as the cathode support material. At high loadings of the active material (50-60 wt %), microscale phase segregation was observed with a conventional cathode support material during the charging/discharging processes but this was suppressed by the confinement of insulating sulfur into the mesopores of the elastic and flexible nanoporous graphene with a large pore volume of 5.3 mL g(-1). As such, durable three-phase contact was achieved among the solid electrolyte, insulating sulfur, and the electrically conductive carbon. Consequently, the electrochemical performances of the assembled all-solid-state batteries were significantly improved and feasible under the harsh conditions of operation at 353 K, and improved cycling stability as well as the highest specific capacity of 716 mA h per gram of cathode (4.6 mA h cm(-2), 0.2 C) was achieved with high sulfur loading (50 wt %).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available