4.8 Article

Studying and Utilizing Traditional Technologies: Microstructure and Formation Mechanism of ε-Fe2O3 on Traditional Japanese Bizen Stoneware

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 13, Issue 32, Pages 38491-38498

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c09394

Keywords

Bizen stoneware; brownish color; iron oxide; crystallographic relationship; spinet structure compound

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [19K05662]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K05662] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional Japanese Bizen stoneware is made by firing green clay in a wood-fired kiln to form specific particles on the ceramic surface. By using an electric furnace and adjusting the gas mixture, similar particles can also be produced industrially.
Traditional Japanese Bizen stoneware is produced by firing a specific type of green clay in a wood-fired kiln at approximately 1200 degrees C. During this process, single crystalline branched dendrite-like particles of AI-substituted epsilon-Fe2O3 (epsilon-Fe1.7Al0.3O3) with widths and lengths of approximately 15 and 30 mu m, respectively, are formed on the surface of the ceramic. Composite particles consisting of epsilon-Fe2O3 epitaxially connected to spinel structure compounds [comprising the Fe-substituted spinel (Mg,Fe)(Al,Fe)(2)O-4 and gamma-Fe2O3)] with lengths of approximately 3 mu m are also generated. The present work clarified the crystallographic relationship between epsilon-Fe2O3 and the spinel structure compounds. In addition, brown-colored samples similar to Bizen pottery and with surface Al-substituted epsilon-Fe2O3 particles were prepared by heating clay with K2CO3 under a 10 vol % CO gas and 90 vol % Ar gas mixture using an electric furnace instead of a firewood kiln. Hence, a traditional method was adapted to achieve the industrial production of epsilon-Fe2O3 crystals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available