4.5 Article

Joint QoS-aware and Cost-efficient Task Scheduling for Fog-cloud Resources in a Volunteer Computing System

Journal

ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET TECHNOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3418501

Keywords

Volunteer computing; fog computing; cloud computing; task scheduling; quality of service (QoS); cost-efficient

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Volunteer computing is a distributed computing approach where volunteers share resources to handle large tasks. Task scheduling algorithms play a crucial role in efficiently utilizing computing resources and reducing costs in heterogeneous volunteer computing systems.
Volunteer computing is an Internet-based distributed computing in which volunteers share their extra available resources to manage large-scale tasks. However, computing devices in a Volunteer Computing System (VCS) are highly dynamic and heterogeneous in terms of their processing power, monetary cost, and data transferring latency. To ensure both of the high Quality of Service (QoS) and low cost for different requests, all of the available computing resources must be used efficiently. Task scheduling is an NP-hard problem that is considered as one of the main critical challenges in a heterogeneous VCS. Due to this, in this article, we design two task scheduling algorithms for VCSs, named Min-CCV and Mtn-V. The main goal of the proposed algorithms is jointly minimizing the computation, communication, and delay violation cost for the Internet of Things (IoT) requests. Our extensive simulation results show that proposed algorithms are able to allocate tasks to volunteer fog/cloud resources more efficiently than the state-of-the-art. Specifically, our algorithms improve the deadline satisfaction task rates around 99.5% and decrease the total cost between 15 to 53% in comparison with the genetic-based algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available