4.5 Article

Central nystagmus plus ABCD2 identifying stroke in acute dizziness presentations

Journal

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 1118-1123

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acem.14295

Keywords

ABCD(2) scores; acute dizziness; HINTS; nystagmus; stroke

Funding

  1. Cultivation Fund of The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University [PYJJ2019-20]
  2. 2019 Decision Consulting and Management Innovation Research Project in Nan'an District, Chongqing [5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of HINTS and ABCD(2) score can effectively differentiate cerebrovascular causes of dizziness, especially when accompanied by skew deviation and ABCD(2) score of 4 or higher. The presence of central pattern of nystagmus and an ABCD(2) score of 4 or higher are practical for identifying cerebrovascular causes in patients with dizziness.
Objective The objective was to explore the ability of head impulse-nystagmus-test of skew (HINTS) combined with ABCD(2) score to identify cerebrovascular causes of dizziness. Materials and Methods We prospectively recruited 85 patients with acute onset of dizziness from September 2016 to December 2018 and analyzed their clinical characteristics, ABCD(2) scores, HINTS, and neuroimages data. Results Acute stroke was identified by MRI in 21 of 85 patients. The mean +/- SD ABCD(2) scores were significantly higher among patients with acute stroke than those without acute stroke (4.0 +/- 0.8 h vs. 2.5 +/- 0.7 h, p < 0.01). The majority (71.4%) of patients with cerebrovascular causes had central pattern of nystagmus at the initial 48 h from symptoms onset. The sensitivity and specificity of HINTS were 100% and 87% for the presence of stroke in patients with nystagmus. When combined central pattern of nystagmus and ABCD(2) >= 4, the sensitivity increased to 100% for identifying cerebrovascular causes. Nystagmus were absence at time of examination in 16.5% of our patients, and ABCD(2) scores in patients who had cerebrovascular diagnoses were all >= 4. Conclusion HINTS examinations could efficiently differentiate stroke from nonstroke under the condition that patients remaining symptomatic, including spontaneous or gaze-evoked nystagmus. It is more practical to apply the combination of central pattern of nystagmus and ABCD(2) >= 4 in ED setting. If patients were absence of central nystagmus at admission, cerebrovascular event should be a priority diagnosis when their ABCD(2) >= 4.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available