4.5 Article

Scale-Up Study of Molten Salt Electrolysis using Cu or Ag Cathode and Vacuum Distillation for the Production of High-Purity Mg Metal from MgO

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE METALLURGY
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 883-897

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40831-021-00367-x

Keywords

Magnesium; Magnesium oxide; Metal cathode; Electrolytic process; Vacuum distillation

Funding

  1. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) grant by the Korea government (MSIT) [CRC-15-06-KIGAM]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the scale-up of a novel electrolytic process and vacuum distillation to produce high-purity Mg metal directly from MgO. The influence of different cathode metals and Mg alloy concentrations on current efficiency, as well as the interaction of Al2O3 with the electrolyte and cathode, were studied. High current efficiencies were achieved in producing Mg alloys such as Mg2Cu and MgAg, with subsequent vacuum distillation resulting in obtaining 99.9997% Mg metal.
To produce high-purity Mg metal directly from MgO, the scale-up of a novel electrolytic process using a metal cathode and vacuum distillation was investigated. The electrolysis of MgO was conducted in MgF2-LiF molten salt using Cu or Ag cathode and graphite anode at 1053 K. The influence of the cathode metal and the concentration of Mg in the Mg alloy on the current efficiency was investigated. In addition, the interaction of Al2O3 in contact with the electrolyte and cathode was studied. When electrolysis was carried out with an applied current of 8.81-9.59 A for 75-95 h, Mg alloys such as Mg2Cu and MgAg were produced with a current efficiency of 82.2-88.0%. In addition, owing to the reaction between the Mg alloy and Al2O3, a dense layer of magnesium aluminum oxide was produced. Afterward, when the vacuum distillation of the Mg alloys was conducted at 1300 K, 99.9997% Mg metal was obtained.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available