4.6 Article

Ingestion and Depuration of Microplastics by a Planktivorous Coral Reef Fish, Pomacentrus amboinensis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.641135

Keywords

polypropylene; polyester; particle; fiber; marine environment; uptake; impact; damselfish

Funding

  1. Australian Institute of Marine Science and James Cook University (AIMS@JCUPh.D.Scholarship)
  2. Australian Museum and Lizard Island Research Station (2018 Rossi Foundation Grant)
  3. National Environmental Science Program Tropical Water Quality Hub
  4. Key Program for International S&T Cooperation Projects: Sino-Australian Centre for Healthy Coasts [2016YFE0101500]
  5. Australia China Science Research Fund [ACSRF 48162]
  6. Australian Government Department of Industry, Innovation and Science
  7. Queensland Government Department of Environment and Science
  8. Australian Institute of Marine Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated microplastic ingestion and depuration kinetics in the planktivorous damselfish using environmentally relevant exposure conditions. The results showed that damselfish ingested both polypropylene (PP) particles and polyester (PET) fibers, with PET fibers having larger body burden and longer depuration rates than PP particles. Higher concentrations of microplastics led to increased body burden and decreased depuration rates. These findings are crucial for improving protocols for future microplastics research and understanding patterns of microplastic contamination in marine organisms.
Microplastics are ubiquitous contaminants in marine environments and organisms. Concerns about potential impacts on marine organisms are usually associated with uptake of microplastics, especially via ingestion. This study used environmentally relevant exposure conditions to investigate microplastic ingestion and depuration kinetics of the planktivorous damselfish, Pomacentrus amboinensis. Irregular shaped blue polypropylene (PP) particles (longest length 125-250 mu m), and regular shaped blue polyester (PET) fibers (length 600-700 mu m) were selected based on physical and chemical characteristics of microplastics commonly reported in the marine environment, including in coral reef ecosystems. Individual adult damselfish were exposed to a single dose of PP particles and PET fibers at concentrations reported for waters of the Great Barrier Reef (i.e., environmentally relevant concentrations, ERC), or future projected higher concentrations (10x ERC, 100x ERC). Measured microplastic concentrations were similar to their nominal values, confirming that PP particles and PET fibers were present at the desired concentrations and available for ingestion by individual damselfish. Throughout the 128-h depuration period, the 88 experimental fish were sampled 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128-h post microplastic exposure and their gastrointestinal tracts (GIT) analyzed for ingested microplastics. While damselfish ingested both experimental microplastics at all concentrations, body burden, and depuration rates of PET fibers were significantly larger and longer, respectively, compared to PP particles. For both microplastic types, exposure to higher concentrations led to an increase in body burden and lower depuration rates. These findings confirm ingestion of PP particles and PET fibers by P. amboinensis and demonstrate for the first time the influence of microplastic characteristics and concentrations on body burden and depuration rates. Finally, despite measures put in place to prevent contamination, extraneous microplastics were recovered from experimental fish, highlighting the challenge to completely eliminate contamination in microplastic exposure studies. These results are critical to inform and continuously improve protocols for future microplastics research, and to elucidate patterns of microplastic contamination and associated risks in marine organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available