4.5 Article

Electrochemical Detection of Prostate Cancer Biomarker PCA3 Using Specific RNA-Based Aptamer Labelled with Ferrocene

Journal

CHEMOSENSORS
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors9040059

Keywords

prostate cancer; RNA transcript PCA3; aptamer; electrochemical biosensor; cyclic voltammograms; impedance spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Ministry of High Education of Iraq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on the feasibility of electrochemical detection of the prostate cancer biomarker PCA3 using a specific RNA aptamer labelled with ferrocene on a screen-printed gold electrode. The results demonstrate successful detection in buffer solutions, with kinetics studies showing high specificity and a potential affinity constant for future diagnostic applications in prostate cancer detection.
This paper reports on a feasibility study of electrochemical in-vitro detection of prostate cancer biomarker PCA3 (prostate cancer antigen 3) in direct assay with specific RNA aptamer labelled with a redox group (ferrocene) and immobilized on a screen-printed gold electrode surface. The cyclic voltammograms and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy methods yield encouraging results on the detection of PCA3 in a range of concentrations from 1 mu g/mL down to 0.1 ng/mL in buffer solutions. Both anodic and cathodic current values in cyclic voltammograms measurements and charge transfer resistance values in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy experiments correlate with the PCA3 concentration in the sample. Kinetics studies of the binding of the PCA3 to our aptamer demonstrated high specificity of the reaction with a characteristic affinity constant of approximately 4.10(-10) molar. The results of this work provide a background for the future development of novel, highly sensitive and cost-effective diagnostic methodologies for prostate cancer detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available