4.4 Article

Efficacy of digital health interventions in youth with chronic medical conditions: A meta-analysis

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100373

Keywords

Adolescent mental health; Pediatrics; Psychotherapy; Internet-and mobile-based intervention; eHealth; mHealth

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [FKZ 01GL1740A, FKZ 01GL1740E]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the efficacy of Internet- and mobile-based interventions for youth with chronic medical conditions in improving psychological and disease-related outcomes. The results showed that these interventions had a positive impact on self-efficacy and disease-related outcomes, but were not significant for other outcomes. Further research is needed to assess the potential of these interventions in collaborative care and improving treatment outcomes.
Background: Digital health interventions might extend service provisions for youth with chronic medical conditions (CC) and comorbid mental health symptoms. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of Internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) for different psychological and disease-related outcomes in children and adolescents with CC. Method: Studies were identified by systematic searches in CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed and PsycINFO, complemented by searches in reference lists of eligible studies and other reviews. We included studies, when they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of an IMI to control conditions in improving psychological and disease-related outcomes in youth (mean age ? 18 years) with CC. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed within a random-effects model, and Hedges? g (with 95% confidence intervals) was calculated as effect size measure. Primary outcomes were comorbid mental health symptoms (i.e., depression, anxiety and stress), as well as quality of life and self-efficacy. Results: A total of 19 randomized controlled trials (2410 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. IMIs were associated with improvements in self-efficacy (g = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.61; I2 = 0) and combined diseaserelated outcomes (g = -0.13; 95% CI, -0.25 to -0.01; I2 = 21). Meta-analyses on other outcomes were nonsignificant, and some pre-planned analyses were not feasible because of a shortage of studies. Conclusion: The available evidence on IMIs for improving mental and health-related outcomes in youth with CC is limited. Our findings point to a rather small benefit and limited efficacy. Future research is needed, to comprehensively assess the potential of IMIs to extend collaborative care, and to identify factors contributing to improved user-centered interventions with better treatment outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available