4.6 Article

Age-Related Palatal Wound Healing: An Experimental In Vivo Study

Journal

BIOLOGY-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biology10030240

Keywords

inflammation; myofibroblasts; palate; rats; wound healing

Categories

Funding

  1. Ernest and Tova Turnheim Clinical Research Fund in Dentistry, Tel Aviv University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Complete wound closure was faster in old rats, with a more dimensional related wound closure observed in young rats. Inflammatory response and myofibroblastic response were significantly delayed and of lower intensity in old rats, although not statistically significant. Reduced initial tissue damage in old rats led to faster clinical wound healing compared to young rats.
We assessed age-related excisional palatal mucoperiosteal wound closure in rats. A 4.2 mm diameter punch was used to create a secondary healing defect in the palate of Wistar rats. Study group-21, 18-month-old vs. control 21, 2-month-old males. The 2-dimensional area, maximum length and width of the soft tissue defect served as clinical outcome parameters. The dynamics of the initial three healing weeks were assessed. Semi-quantitative histomorphometric analysis of inflammation and myofibroblasts served for the evaluation of the inflammatory and proliferative wound healing phases. Complete wound closure was faster in the old rats. A dimensional related wound closure was observed in the young rats versus a symmetrical wound closure in the old rats. Inflammatory response was significantly delayed and of lower intensity in the old rats. Myofibroblastic response, representing the proliferative stage, was delayed and of lower intensity in the old rats, albeit not statistically significant. Reduced initial tissue damage due to decreased and delayed inflammatory response in the old rats ultimately led to faster clinical wound healing compared to the young rats, despite a statistically non-significant lower proliferative response in the old rats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available